 Finetuning Your Forecasting System
May 15, 2003
I’ve been involved in demand forecasting for decades in a variety of
circumstances, including as a business forecaster, consultant, and analyst.Throughout
the years, demand planning vendors have told me how their statistical
algorithms could forecast better than anyone else’s and what a competitive
advantage they were. As a skeptic, I’ve always advised them that as
long as the methods they used detected recurring patterns in historical
demand data, then that sufficed, since you could only extract so much
information from history. I further advised them that they should sell
their products on other features—like collaboration that incorporates
market intelligence— that offer improved forecast accuracy when applied
to a statistically based baseline forecast.
Terra Technology, a startup staffed by pedigree,
quantitative–savvy employees from best–of–breed supply chain vendors
including Numetrix/J.D.Edwards, i2 Technologies,
and Manugistics, recently pitched what appeared
at first to be the same old story, but this time, my response was different.
Terra’s statistical methods to improve the accuracy of a forecast seem
to have potential. Its approach, based on consulting experiences and
incorporated in its High Definition Demand software products, uses detailed
data—such as non–aggregated individual orders, cannibalizations, and
substitutes—to improve an existing forecast that supports the approach
of getting the "best estimate of demand, given available information."
For example,Terra’s method would detect when a customer places a large
forward–buy order, signaling a decrease in its demand as it is unlikely
to order for a while, in contrast to most forecasting approaches that
would either wrongly disregard them or take them as an increase in future
demand, rather than a decrease.
Terra’s algorithms project more granular daily and weekly variations
in demand, aimed at improving existing weekly or monthly forecasts.
Its methods have been successfully piloted at Campbell Soup, where forecast
error rates have improved significantly. Campbell is awaiting software
with which to supplement its existing Distribution Requirements Planning
(DRP) and demand planning systems to improve transportation equipment
planning, to be followed by distribution and production planning. Other
high–profile Consumer Product companies,such as Georgia–Pacific, are
planning to pilot Terra’s approach.
Generally, I believe there is real promise in Terra˙s methods,but more
proofs of concept are needed. Meanwhile,companies—especially those
in the Consumer Products industry—looking to improve daily and weekly
short–term forecasts without replacing their existing systems,might
benefit by getting in on the ground floor of what could turn out to
be one of the most important developments to come along in operational
forecasting in a long time.
—Larry Lapide, Vice President of Supply Chain
|
|
|