| |
| |
|
Green Initiatives Lori Castle | "Green"
is perhaps the buzz word of the year, and though incorrectly touted by
some, the majority of consumer goods companies are serious about
sustainability, dedicating resources and setting goals to their
initiatives. For perspective on what the industry is doing, CGT spoke
with Robert Byrne, president and CEO of Terra Technology, who last year spoke at the United Nations Conference on how demand-driven planning can reduce waste and slow climate change.
Why is it important for consumer products companies to adopt green initiatives?
Byrne: There are three main reasons: reduction of
environmental impact, meeting consumer preferences and reducing costs.
Some of the environmental impacts are summarized below:
In the United States, manufacturing is the single largest source of
energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in the industrial sector,
accounting for about 84 percent of energy-related carbon dioxide
emissions and 24 percent of the total production of carbon dioxide.
U.S. manufacturing consumed 90 percent of the energy in the industrial
sector in 2002. With $1.9 trillion dollars of business inventory in the
United States, there is plenty of opportunity to reduce production and
associated costs and impacts.
Motor carriers represent 48 percent of total logistics costs in 2006
and consumed 95 billion liters of diesel fuel that year, creating more
than 250 million metric tons of carbon dioxide. According to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), transportation in the United
States accounts for approximately 33 percent of total greenhouse gas
emissions from fossil fuel consumption. Reducing unnecessary
transportation of goods has an immediate impact on greenhouse emissions
and, with ever-increasing fuel prices, an immediate impact on corporate
profits.
Are there benefits to "green" projects other than being a good corporate citizen?
Byrne: Patrick Penfield,
assistant professor of supply chain management at Syracuse University,
once said, "One of the major reasons why companies are interested in
the green supply chain and sustainability is that they realize [carbon
and energy waste] is an expense; if you really look underneath it, it's
about cost savings. It's not about saving the environment."
This quote may sound somewhat cynical, but it is quite important to
know that it is true. Only through higher efficiency and lower costs
can we maintain our standard of living while reducing our environmental
impact. Plus, public companies have a fiduciary responsibility to their
shareholders, and spending significant sums on unprofitable projects is
not a recipe for success. The Procter & Gamble Company's
goal is to improve its products with "no trade-offs" for the consumer
-- so that means product performance that is at least equal to current
products but more environmentally friendly.
What is the first step a consumer goods manufacturer should take to begin a green initiative?
Byrne: There are many types of environmental impacts and
even more potential initiatives to address them. Reduce, reuse,
recycle, in descending order of importance, has been the guideline for
decades now, as reducing use up front is far better than recycling
spent materials. Reduction not only avoids raw material consumption but
also lessens the carbon footprint in many ways, from no energy spent on
production to no energy spent on transportation. Recycling may actually
increase the carbon footprint for many materials.
A good example is the ongoing trend to concentrate liquid laundry
detergent. By making it twice as effective, weight, volume,
transportation, etc., are reduced by 50 percent without impairing any
of the consumer benefits or experience. The cost of goods sold will
also drop, although not as much.
Of course, not every product can be shrunk without impairing usability,
so look for other ways to reduce your inventory investment. Improving
the performance of a manufacturer's supply chain can be the quickest
and most effective starting point for a successful sustainability
program. By avoiding production and transportation of unnecessary goods
a manufacturer completely eliminates the associated resource and energy
consumption.
When will green initiatives be viewed as a normal part of doing business rather than a separate category of projects?
Byrne: This should happen as soon as possible. Virtually
all projects have some kind of green impact, from repainting your
headquarters to new product design to inventory management, so all
projects should be evaluated against both return and environmental and
other non-economic impacts. Publicly traded companies answer to
shareholders and must justify the expense of all green initiatives
because these programs impact corporate profits. Manufacturers must
also coordinate green initiatives throughout the entire organization to
ensure that new programs actually have an overall positive impact on
the environment. What is the point of reducing your packaging if the
benefits are offset by increasing inventory to improve customer
service? What you gain in reduced packaging you lose in wasted fuel and
increased carbon emissions.
Too many green projects are started because the cost is felt to be low
enough to justify the investment, but inadequate exploration of
alternatives has been done, and many projects that are not primarily
"green" offer environmental benefits that exceed green projects and
also real ROI. For example, AMR Research says that consumer products
companies who are better at demand forecasting have 24 percent less raw
material inventory; 22 percent less finished goods inventory; 21
percent shorter cash-to-cash cycle times; 32 percent shorter days sales
outstanding; 22 percent better plant utilization; and 9 percent lower
costs representing approximately 5 percent of revenue. Simply by being
better at demand forecasting, these companies decrease different types
of inventory by more than 20 percent, improve plant utilization by 22
percent and decrease costs 9 percent. Producing fewer inventories,
increasing plant efficiency, decreasing costs and shorter cash-to-cash
cycle times all create a positive return on green.
| |
| | |
| | |